MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4316467627 · doi:10.1177/14713012231151723

<i>Dementia Without Borders</i> : Building community connections to reduce stigma and foster inclusion

2023· article· en· W4316467627 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alison Phinney, Marigrace Becker, Lee Burnside, Paulina Malcolm, Gloria Puurveen

Bibliographic record

VenueDementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMental Health and Patient Involvement
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStigma (botany)DementiaInclusion (mineral)Public relationsSociologyPsychologyGender studiesPolitical scienceMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Around the world people with dementia face stigma and social exclusion. An interdisciplinary team from Seattle, Washington, and Vancouver, British Columbia led a collaborative project developing cross-border community partnerships to increase awareness and reduce stigma, promote social participation of people with dementia, and enhance their well-being. The work was organized around three themes - citizen engagement, social entrepreneurship, and creative expression – and involved regular meetings so researchers, community providers, and people with dementia and care partners could know each other better. Dementia Without Borders was organized as an end-of-project celebration, a public festival bringing together community members from both countries to share what the team had learned from each together. The event took place at the Peace Arch, an international park straddling the border between Washington and British Columbia. Over 140 people arrived on their respective sides, created banners, and walked together to the Peace Arch to meet and exchange gifts with those coming from the other country. A picnic shelter was used to display art created by people with dementia and outdoor tables allowed everyone to eat together and listen to poetry readings and musical performances. Feedback was overwhelmingly positive with many expressing a sense of hope and belonging. This project has leveraged the symbolic power of an international border to generate new ideas about fostering social inclusion and reducing stigma for people with dementia. It shows the importance of place and history, building relationships on trust and participation, and being flexible and responsive to opportunities for social innovation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0020.017
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDementiaSame topicMental Health and Patient InvolvementFrench-language works237,207