MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Decomposition-Based RLS Algorithm for Stereophonic Acoustic Echo Cancellation

2022· article· en· W4316659633 on OpenAlexaff
Ionuț-Dorinel Fîciu, Constantin Paleologu, Jacob Benesty, Camelia Elisei-Iliescu, Cristian-Lucian Stanciu, Cristian Anghel

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStereophonic soundComputer scienceAlgorithmAsynchronous communicationEcho (communications protocol)TeleconferenceDecorrelationSpeech recognitionComputational complexity theoryAdaptive filterChannel (broadcasting)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In hands-free teleconferencing systems, stereo transmission provides telepresence thanks to our binaural hearing system and gives a realistic presence that actual single-channel systems cannot offer. In this context, stereophonic acoustic echo cancellation (SAEC) is necessary for full-duplex quality communication. Nevertheless, the long length of the acoustic impulse responses represents one of the main challenges in SAEC, which significantly impacts the overall performance of the adaptive filters used to model the acoustic echo paths. In this paper, we propose a decomposition-based approach using the nearest Kronecker product, which results in a combination of shorter filters to solve the original system identification problem. The solution is formulated in terms of the recursive least-squares (RLS) algorithm, which is very appealing for its convergence features. Besides the lower computational complexity, the proposed decomposition-based RLS algorithm achieves a better tracking behavior as compared to its conventional counterpart. Simulation results support these practical features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207