A Synchro-Set-Aided Breadth-First Sphere Decoder for Polar-Coded MIMO Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The joint optimization of multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) detection and polar decoding has become a research hotspot for future communication systems. The error-correction performance of the separate detection and decoding (SDD) is far from the Shannon capacity, which cannot meet the requirements of communication scenarios such as ultra-reliable and low latency communications (URLLC). The existing joint detection and decoding (JDD) using breadth-first sphere decoding (BFSD) improves the reliability over SDD but still has a huge performance loss on low-rate codes. In this paper, JDD using synchro-set-aided BFSD (SA-BFSD) is proposed to greatly improve the error-correction performance for polar-coded MIMO systems. We first propose a method to generate the symbol synchro sets through the concept of frozen symbols, then refine the symbol synchro sets based on the characteristics analysis of the channel matrix. We optimize the enumerating order of the symbols and reduce the enumerating levels. The frame error rate (FER) and the bit error rate of the proposed algorithms are significantly improved especially for the low-rate codes. The proposed SA-BFSD JDD achieves an up to 7.8 dB performance gain over BFSD at FER <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$=10^{-3}$</tex-math></inline-formula> . The hardware architecture of the polar JDD scheme is first implemented with SMIC 40-nm CMOS technology for MIMO systems. The reliability and latency of SA-BFSD are much better than those of the existing works, which could meet the requirements of URLLC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".