MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4316663034 · doi:10.1049/cit2.12156

Kernel extreme learning machine‐based general solution to forward kinematics of parallel robots

2023· article· en· W4316663034 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersHigher Education Discipline Innovation ProjectNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsForward kinematicsKinematicsInverse kinematicsExtreme learning machineComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSupport vector machineParallel manipulatorKernel (algebra)RobotAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The forward kinematics of parallel robots is a challenging issue due to its highly coupled non‐linear relation among branch chains. This paper presents a novel approach to forward kinematics of parallel robots based on kernel extreme learning machine (KELM). To tackle with the forward kinematics solution of fully parallel robots, the forward kinematics solution of parallel robots is equivalently transformed into a machine learning model first. On this basis, a computational model combining sparrow search algorithm and KELM is then established, which can serve as both regression and classification. Based on SSA‐optimised KELM (SSA‐KELM) established in this study, a binary discriminator for judging the existence of the forward kinematics solution and a multi‐label regression model for predicting the forward kinematics solution are built to obtain the forward kinematics general solution of parallel robots with different structural configurations and parameters. To evaluate the proposed model, a numerical case on this dataset collected by the inverse kinematics model of a typical 6‐DOF parallel robot is conducted, followed by the results manifesting that the binary discriminator with the discriminant accuracy of 88.50% is superior over ELM, KELM, support vector machine and logistic regression. The multi‐label regression model, with the root mean squared error of 0.06 mm for the position and 0.15° for the orientation, outperforms the double‐hidden‐layer back propagation (2‐BP), ELM, KELM and genetic algorithm‐optimised KELM. Furthermore, numerical cases of parallel robots with different structural configurations and parameters are compared with state‐of‐the‐art models. Moreover, these results of numerical simulation and experiment on the host computer demonstrate that the proposed model displays its high precision, high robustness and rapid convergence, which provides a candidate for the forward kinematics of parallel robots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it