MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4316663034 · doi:10.1049/cit2.12156

Kernel extreme learning machine‐based general solution to forward kinematics of parallel robots

2023· article· en· W4316663034 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Ma, Xuechao Duan, Dan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueCAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersHigher Education Discipline Innovation ProjectNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsForward kinematicsKinematicsInverse kinematicsExtreme learning machineComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSupport vector machineParallel manipulatorKernel (algebra)RobotAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The forward kinematics of parallel robots is a challenging issue due to its highly coupled non‐linear relation among branch chains. This paper presents a novel approach to forward kinematics of parallel robots based on kernel extreme learning machine (KELM). To tackle with the forward kinematics solution of fully parallel robots, the forward kinematics solution of parallel robots is equivalently transformed into a machine learning model first. On this basis, a computational model combining sparrow search algorithm and KELM is then established, which can serve as both regression and classification. Based on SSA‐optimised KELM (SSA‐KELM) established in this study, a binary discriminator for judging the existence of the forward kinematics solution and a multi‐label regression model for predicting the forward kinematics solution are built to obtain the forward kinematics general solution of parallel robots with different structural configurations and parameters. To evaluate the proposed model, a numerical case on this dataset collected by the inverse kinematics model of a typical 6‐DOF parallel robot is conducted, followed by the results manifesting that the binary discriminator with the discriminant accuracy of 88.50% is superior over ELM, KELM, support vector machine and logistic regression. The multi‐label regression model, with the root mean squared error of 0.06 mm for the position and 0.15° for the orientation, outperforms the double‐hidden‐layer back propagation (2‐BP), ELM, KELM and genetic algorithm‐optimised KELM. Furthermore, numerical cases of parallel robots with different structural configurations and parameters are compared with state‐of‐the‐art models. Moreover, these results of numerical simulation and experiment on the host computer demonstrate that the proposed model displays its high precision, high robustness and rapid convergence, which provides a candidate for the forward kinematics of parallel robots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCAAI Transactions on Intelligence TechnologySame topicMachine Learning and ELMFrench-language works237,207