Brushing Characteristics and Dietary Patterns of Orthodontic Patients with Fixed Appliances
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Proper brushing practices are required to maintain good oral hygiene. This is of utmost importance in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances as these appliances can facilitate plaque accumulation and make cleaning process difficult. Hence if good oral hygiene is not maintained with these appliances then deterioration of gingival and periodontal health will result. Frequent intake of acidic drinks and sweet food can further harm the teeth. Aim: To determine tooth brushing characteristics of orthodontic patients with fixed appliances. Determine dietary patterns of such patients. Determine other oral hygiene measures used by them. Study Design: Cross sectional study Duration of the study: 6 months Methodology: Questionnaires were conveniently distributed among 104 orthodontic patients who met the inclusion criteria and provided consent to provide the information. Data collected was analyzed using SPSS 2020. Results: Most (70%) of the responding patients brush two times daily. Correct brush type (soft) is in use by 77% of the individuals. Approximately 64-66% of individuals combine vertical and horizontal technique of tooth brushing, use interdental toothbrush and report that they hardly intake fizzy drinks. However, only 55% patients have reported brushing for total duration of 2 minutes. Around 30% of the respondents have frequent intake of junk food and sugary food. Practical Implication: According to our knowledge, this study is the first study to date to evaluate the brushing habits and dietary patterns in Pakistani orthodontic patients with fixed appliances. Conclusions: The present study shows that majority of the patients show good brushing practices but need to improve their total duration of brushing. Frequent intake of junk food, sweets and fizzy drinks are also avoided by most patients. Use of fluoride mouthwashes and floss was seen in lesser proportion of surveyed patients. Keywords: Brushing characteristics, oral hygiene measures, dietary patterns, orthodontic patients with fixed appliances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".