The subhorizon Ofh as a prospective geoindicator of temperate soil quality in relation to selected trace elements and PAHs: a review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soils, next to vegetation, are one of the most popular indicators in environmental quality studies. The response of soil to air pollution is less complex than the response of vegetation. In soils, mainly in their upper layers, the deposition of compounds may occur almost undisturbed; therefore, results of chemical analyses are readily used in the assessment of changes caused by natural processes and anthropogenic activities. In a temperate climate zone, the outermost layer of forest soils is formed by an organic horizon (O), which comprises two basic subhorizons, of which the organic fermentative-humic subhorizon (Ofh) is recognized as the most noteworthy. The subhorizon Ofh encompasses partially and fully decomposed organic matter (humic and fulvic acids, humins), as well as Fe, Mn, and Al oxides and hydroxides, forming a characteristic tangled mat. The structure pattern of this subhorizon is responsible for the higher concentrations of elements and organic compounds, which are immobilized through sorption, complexation, or precipitation. Some previous studies have shown that the subhorizon Ofh has enhanced accumulative properties in comparison to the remaining subjacent soil horizons. Results derived from soil studies in the Holy Cross Mountains (south-central Poland) have also revealed that this subhorizon is mainly enriched in polycyclic aromatic compounds (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) and some trace elements (Hg, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn). This could make the subhorizon Ofh a potential geoindicator of soil quality in relation to these compounds over the temperate climate zone. However, further study on this issue is needed to confirm its application in environmental monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".