MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PR002: Identification of metabolic adaptation mechanisms that drive anoikis suppression and metastasis in Ewing sarcoma

2023· article· en· W4317107485 on OpenAlexaff
Haifeng Zhang, Christopher S. Hughes, Alberto Delaidelli, Yue Z. Huang, Taras Shyp, Xiaqiu Yang, Poul H. Sorensen

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnoikisCancer researchChemistryProgrammed cell deathGlutathioneCancer cellMetastasisBiologyCell biologyCancerBiochemistryApoptosisGeneticsEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Metastasizing cancer cells must overcome anoikis (detachment-induced death) prior to colonization in distant organs. Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is a highly aggressive bone and soft tissue cancer that mainly occurs in children, adolescents, and young adults. EwS patients with metastatic disease have a 5-year survival rate of only 15-20%, which has not changed for decades. Our recent study identified that EwS cells are highly dependent on augmented cysteine metabolism and glutathione biogenesis in anoikis suppression and metastasis through the IL1RAP protein. Mechanistically, IL1RAP binds the cell surface system Xc- transporter to enhance exogenous cystine uptake, thereby replenishing cysteine and glutathione antioxidant pools. Moreover, under cystine depletion, IL1RAP induces cystathionine gamma lyase (CTH) to activate the transsulfuration pathway for de novo cysteine synthesis. Furthermore, we show that inhibitors of Glutaminase (GLS) and Glutamate cysteine ligase (GCL), two critical enzymes for glutamate and glutathione synthesis, synergistically induce massive anoikis and ferroptosis in EwS cells. However, as a single agent, GLSi or GCLi only had moderate effects on EwS survival. Our global proteomic analysis identified dramatic adaptive changes in response to GLSi and GCLi, which may facilitate EwS cell survival and metastasis upon blockade of these metabolic processes. To further pinpoint critical regulators of anoikis and metastasis, we found that anokis suppression is governed by EWS-FLI1, a driver oncogene in EwS, and depletion of EWS-FLI1 triggered anoikis and led to cell death of EwS tumor spheroids formed in 3D cultures, whereas only a mild cytostatic effect was induced in 2D cultures. Given the predominant role of oncogenic EWS-FLI1 in anoikis suppression, we performed proteomic analysis in EwS cells +/- EWS-FLI1 depletion or gene rescue cultured under either 2D or 3D conditions prior to anoikis onset. We found that the 2D-to-3D transition induced marked global proteomic changes, suggesting a molecular reprogramming in response to 3D-induced anoikis stress that might be crucial for anoikis suppression. Moreover, a significant subset of these adaptive proteomic changes was driven by EWS-FLI1. Among these proteins, we validated that CDH11 is highly expressed in EwS compared with >1000 other human cancer cell lines, and localized on the EwS cell surface, which might be targeted via immunotherapeutic strategies. Thus, these studies provide insights into adaptive mechanisms upon perturbation of glutathione metabolism and oncogenes that drive anoikis suppression and metastasis in EwS. Citation Format: Hai-Feng Zhang, Christopher S. Hughes, Alberto Delaidelli, Yue Zhou Huang, Taras Shyp, Xiaqiu Yang, Poul H. Sorensen. Identification of metabolic adaptation mechanisms that drive anoikis suppression and metastasis in Ewing sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Cancer Metastasis; 2022 Nov 14-17; Portland, OR. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;83(2 Suppl_2):Abstract nr PR002.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207