MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317181705 · doi:10.1289/isee.2022.o-op-067

Air pollution, lung function and mortality: survival and mediation analyses in UK Biobank

2022· article· en· W4317181705 on OpenAlexaff
Anna L. Guyatt, Yutong Cai, Danny Doiron, Martin J. Tobin, Anna Hansell

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioProportional hazards modelVital capacitySpirometryBiobankCohortCohort studyEnvironmental healthConfidence intervalDemographyInternal medicineLung functionLungDiffusing capacity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aim: Air pollution is associated with lung function, and both are associated with premature mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD). We performed mediation analysis to estimate the proportion of the relationship between air pollution and mortality or incident CVD explained by the association between air pollution and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Methods: We used data from the UK Biobank cohort (aged 40-69 years at baseline 2006-2010) with 8-year follow-up to mortality (N=208,998) and incident CVD (N=199,577). Exposures to PM10, PM2.5, and NO2 were assessed by land-use regression modelling to estimate exposures at baseline. Lung function (Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), FEV1) was measured by spirometry and transformed to Global Lung Function Initiative z-scores. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards and causal proportional hazards mediation analysis models were fitted, stratified by smoking status. Results: Long-term exposures to PM2.5 and NO2 (but not PM10) were associated with incident CVD, with similar effect sizes between ever-smokers and never-smokers (Hazard Ratio (HR) per IQR in ever-smokers, PM2.5: 1.05 [95%CI: 1.01, 1.09]; NO2: 1.04 [95%CI 1.00, 1.09]). PM2.5 was associated with CVD mortality in ever-smokers only (HR per IQR: 1.15 [95%CI: 1.02, 1.30]. Positive but non-significant associations were found with all-cause mortality. FEV1 and FVC were associated with all-cause, CVD mortality and incident CVD. Point estimates for the mortality outcomes were larger in ever-smokers than never-smokers. Mediated proportions of the air pollution—all-cause mortality estimates driven by FEV1 were 18% [95%CI: 2%-33%] for PM2.5, and 27% [95%CI: 3%-51%] for NO2. The estimated mediated proportions for air pollution—incident CVD were 9% [95%CI: 4%-13%] for PM2.5 and 16% [95%CI: 6%-25%] for NO2. Conclusions: Lower FEV1 may mediate the effect of PM2.5 and NO2 on mortality and incident CVD outcomes, with more pronounced effects for NO2 than for PM2.5. Keywords: air pollution; lung function; mortality; mediation analysis; cardiovascular;

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.070
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.070
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207