MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317182361 · doi:10.1289/isee.2022.o-op-215

Ambient air pollution concentrations and incidence of spontaneous abortion

2022· article· en· W4317182361 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amelia K. Wesselink, Kipruto Kirwa, Perry Hystad, Joel D. Kaufman, Adam A. Szpiro, Mary D. Willis, David A. Savitz, Jonathan I. Levy, Kenneth J. Rothman, Ellen M. Mikkelsen, Elizabeth E. Hatch, Lauren A. Wise

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterquartile rangeMedicinePregnancyConfidence intervalGestationIncidence (geometry)Hazard ratioConfoundingAbortionProspective cohort studyProportional hazards modelCohort studyDemographyEnvironmental healthObstetricsInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and aims: Previous epidemiologic studies suggest that air pollution exposure may be a risk factor for spontaneous abortion (SAB), i.e., pregnancy loss before 20 weeks’ gestation. However, most studies identified SABs from administrative records, which likely under-ascertain losses early in pregnancy. In a prospective preconception cohort study of couples trying to conceive, we examined the association between residential ambient air pollution concentrations and SAB incidence. Methods: Eligible female participants enrolled during 2013-2019. They were aged 21-45 years, residents of the United States or Canada, and trying to conceive without fertility treatments. Participants completed online questionnaires at enrollment, every 8 weeks during preconception, and about 8 weeks and 32 weeks of pregnancy. We restricted our analysis to the 5,513 participants who conceived within 12 cycles of follow-up. We estimated two-week average residential ambient concentrations of particulate matter <2.5 µm (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3) using country-specific spatiotemporal models. We used Cox proportional hazards regression with gestational weeks as the time scale to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for an interquartile range (IQR) increase in exposure, adjusting for individual- and neighborhood-level confounders. Results: 19% of participants reported a SAB during follow-up; of these, 72% were early losses (<8 weeks of gestation, median=6 weeks). Air pollution concentrations were not appreciably associated with SAB incidence. Among US participants, IRRs for a one-IQR increase in concentrations during the two weeks before conception were 1.08 (95% CI: 0.93-1.24) for PM2.5 (IQR=3.0 µg/m3), 1.02 (95% CI: 0.90-1.15) for NO2 (IQR=5.4 µg/m3), and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.86-1.17) for O3 (IQR=10.7 µg/m3). Associations were similar among Canadian participants, and among those reporting early losses. Conclusions: Air pollution concentrations showed little association with SAB incidence in this cohort of pregnancy planners. Keywords: air pollution, preconception cohort, pregnancy loss, spontaneous abortion

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207