MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4317240844 · doi:10.5539/jas.v15n2p56

Multivariate Analysis of Physical and Chemical Soil Attributes Under Forage Palm Cultivation and Agriculture Reuse in the Semiarid Region

2023· article· en· W4317240844 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Francisco de Oliveira Mesquita, E. S. A. G. de Vasconcelos, E. C. de Lira, E. dos S. Felix, Rafael Oliveira Batista, L. A. L. de Paiva, E. F. Mesquita, D. M. A. de Melo, A. G. de Luna Souto, D. da C. L. Coelho, Freitas Pereira, A. P. Bakker, J. da S. Araújo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural and Food Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrrigationAgronomyEnvironmental scienceOrganic matterSoil fertilitySoil organic matterSoil testBulk densityPalmSoil waterBiologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of treated effluents (UTE) for irrigation has grown considerably in recent years, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of soil fertility under cultivation with forage cactus intercropped with different legumes. The experiment was conducted over a period of two years in a research unit that uses irrigation with reuse water (RW) in consortia of cactus species with wood and forage legumes. The soil layers were analyzed in the layers of 0-10 and 10-20 cm in three seasons: T0: without reuse water (RW); T1: dry season + reuse water (RW); T2: wet season + reuse water (RW) under cultivation of three palm varieties or cochineal cactus (mexican elephant ear palm, small palm and baiana). The soil attributes evaluated were granulometry, soil density, pH, salinity, sodicity, macronutrients, organic matter, Mineral N and total organic carbon stock (O.C.S). The plants were periodically irrigated with domestic effluent treated with constant irrigation 2 L h-1. The data were subjected to multivariate statistical analysis, using correlation matrix, cluster analysis, and factorial analysis considering the factors as principal components. According to the factorial analysis, Factor 1 (F1) and Factor 2 (F2)—F1 consisting of Sand, Ca2+, pHs, stock of. K and base saturation (V), and F2 consisting of Soil Organic Matter (SOM), stock of. Mg, CEC, stock of Ca2+, clay and soil density—were essential to differentiate the environments. The cluster analysis formed four groups. The structural groups showed greater similarity, denoting the relationship between source material and land use, followed by the chemical groups pHs, Ac. Pot., V+, CEC, Na+, stock of Na+, PST, and Ds; the structural weighted total porosity, stock of P.; Ksoil, stock of K, and Mg, SB, Te, stock of . Mg, and finally stock of Total, stock of Nitrog, Nit. Inorg.; SOM, TOC, Ca2+ and Tp of soil. This is a local peculiarity due to the climatic pattern of the Brazilian semiarid region in use of domestic sewage treated in agriculture as a forage index and as a social factor. The multivariate statistical analysis through principal component analysis and clustering made it possible to form groups according to soil attributes, which can help in decision making regarding soil fertility and fertilization management in this region with agricultural reuse application mainly in semiarid regions of Brazil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural Science→Same topicAgricultural and Food Sciences→French-language works237,207→