The Interaction of Methyl Formate with Proton-Bound Solvent Clusters in the Gas Phase and the Unimolecular Chemistry of the Reaction Products
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ion–molecule reactions between neutral methyl formate (MF) and proton-bound solvent clusters W2H+, W3H+, M2H+, E2H+, and E3H+ (W = water, M = methanol, and E = ethanol) showed that the major reaction product is a solvent molecule loss from the initial encounter complex, followed by the formation of protonated methyl formate (MFH+). Collision-induced dissociation breakdown curves of the initially formed solvent-MF proton-bound pairs and trimers were obtained as a function of collision energy and modeled to extract relative activation energies for the observed channels. Density functional theory calculations (B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p)) of the solvent loss reaction were consistent with barrierless reactions in each case. The MF(M)H+ ion also exhibited loss of CH4 at higher collision energies. The reaction was calculated to proceed via the migration of the MF methyl group to form a loosely bound complex between neutral CH4 and an ion comprising (CH3OH)(CO2)H+. Overall, the results indicate that the interaction of methyl formate with atmospheric water can form stable encounter complexes that will dissociate to form protonated methyl formate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".