MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4317438107 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.06113

Quantum Encryption in Phase Space for Coherent Optical Communications

2023· preprint· en· W4317438107 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Adrian D. C. Chan, Mostafa Khalil, Kh Arif Shahriar, David V. Plant, Lawrence R. Chen, Randy Kuang

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMitacs
KeywordsEncryptionComputer scienceQuantum key distributionSecure transmissionComputer networkTransmitterTransmission (telecommunications)Key (lock)Electronic engineeringQuantumComputer securityTelecommunicationsPhysicsEngineeringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical layer attacks on communication networks are one of the weakest reinforced areas of the network, allowing attackers to overcome security when proper safeguards are not put into place. Here, we present our solution or Quantum Encryption in Phase Space (QEPS), a physical layer encryption method to secure data over the optical fiber, based on our novel round-trip Coherent-based Two-Field Quantum Key Distribution (CTF-QKD) scheme. We perform a theoretical study through simulation and provide an experimental demonstration. The same encryption is used for QEPS as CTF-QKD but achieved through a pre-shared key and one-directional transmission design. QEPS is uniquely different from traditional technology where encryption is performed at the optical domain with coherent states by applying a quantum phase-shifting operator. The pre-shared secret is used to seed a deterministic random number generator and control the phase modulator at the transmitter for encryption and at the receiver for decryption. Using commercially available simulation software, we study two preventative measures for different modulation formats which will prevent an eavesdropper from obtaining any data. QEPS demonstrates that it is secure against tapping attacks when attackers have no information of the phase modulator and pre-shared key. Finally, an experiment with commercial components demonstrates QEPS system integrability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.094 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)→Same topicQuantum Information and Cryptography→French-language works237,207→