MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317478410 · doi:10.6002/ect.2022.0291

Contribution of Turkey in Heart Transplant Research: A Web of Science Database Search

2023· article· en· W4317478410 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Serpil Şahin, Sevil Alkan

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental and Clinical Transplantation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurkishMedicineHeart transplantationWeb of scienceTransplantationLibrary scienceDatabaseInternal medicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: In 2001, Turkey performed its the first successful heart transplant. Since 2011, 765 heart transplants have been conducted among 15 heart transplant centers. The scientific impact of Turkish articles on heart transplantation remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Turkey's contributions in international heart transplant research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bibliometric study approach was used to assess publications on heart transplantation, which included analysis of year of publication, organizations/authors, sponsorship, keywords, citations, and other characteristics. Titles, abstracts, and key words were searched in the Web of Science database for terms that included "heart" or "cardiac" and "transplantation." Methods for both quantitative and qualitative data analysis were used. RESULTS: During the analysis period of 1970 through 2021, 6370 article publications were retrieved with an average of 20.88 citations/article and 133 018 total citations. H index was 129. Most of the retrieved articles were from research areas of surgery (n = 2876; 45.14%), followed by transplantation (n = 2818; 44.23%) and cardiovascular system cardiology (n = 2522; 39.59%). Annual citation growth showed slow growth until 1986. The highest number of citations was seen in 2021 (n = 702). The United States led countries on articles (n = 2924; 45.9%), followed by Germany (n = 458; 7.19%), England (n = 411; 6.45%), Canada (n = 384; 6.02%), France (n = 330; 5.18%), and Spain (n = 329; 5.16%). The other 84 countries totaled 753 (11.82%) articles. Turkey ranked eighteenth with 87 publications, with Başkent University (n = 37) and Ege University (n = 13) being the leading centers on heart transplant research in Turkey. CONCLUSIONS: Publications from the United States continue to increase. The workload of both transplant surgery and research and publishing is challenging and Turkish researchers are encouraged to make strides at innovations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0540.072
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.221
GPT teacher head0.532
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental and Clinical TransplantationSame topicTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207