MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Foreign body in the hypopharynx: late prosthesis extrusion after cervical arthrodesis

2023· article· en· W4317486560 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sofia Fontes de Oliva Costa, Rafael de Castro, Daniel Naves, Eduardo Vieira Couto

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Case Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Estadual de Campinas
KeywordsMedicineForeign bodySurgeryArthrodesisForcepsProsthesisCervical spineAirway

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a case report of a rare airway Foreign Body (FB), the first reported case of an extruded prosthesis of previous cervical spine arthrodesis still attached to the wall of the hypopharynx, obstructing the airway, and requiring immediate removal. A 56-year-old man with a history of previous cervical arthrodesis (C3-C7). He presented anterior displacement of the Cage Device and erosion of the posterior wall of the hypopharynx, with the prosthesis causing partial obstruction of the larynx. After the Neurosurgery and Radiology team determined that there were no risks of cervical spine instability, we were able to remove the device in the operating room using Laryngoscope and McGill forceps with success. After proper evaluation of the case, we were able to remove the foreign body uneventfully. Given the rarity of this complication, we hope this case report can assist in the treatment and management of future cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0070.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of Case ReportsSame topicCervical and Thoracic MyelopathyFrench-language works237,207