Framework for Geometric Information Extraction and Digital Modeling from LiDAR Data of Road Scenarios
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Road geometric information and a digital model based on light detection and ranging (LiDAR) can perform accurate geometric inventories and three-dimensional (3D) descriptions for as-built roads and infrastructures. However, unorganized point clouds and complex road scenarios would reduce the accuracy of geometric information extraction and digital modeling. There is a standardization need for information extraction and 3D model construction that integrates point cloud processing and digital modeling. This paper develops a framework from semantic segmentation to geometric information extraction and digital modeling based on LiDAR data. A semantic segmentation network is improved for the purpose of dividing the road surface and infrastructure. The road boundary and centerline are extracted by the alpha-shape and Voronoi diagram methods based on the semantic segmentation results. The road geometric information is obtained by a coordinate transformation matrix and the least square method. Subsequently, adaptive road components are constructed using Revit software. Thereafter, the road route, road entity model, and various infrastructure components are generated by the extracted geometric information through Dynamo and Revit software. Finally, a detailed digital model of the road scenario is developed. The Toronto-3D and Semantic3D datasets are utilized for analysis through training and testing. The overall accuracy (OA) of the proposed net for the two datasets is 95.3 and 95.0%, whereas the IoU of segmented road surfaces is 95.7 and 97.9%. This indicates that the proposed net could accomplish superior performance for semantic segmentation of point clouds. The mean absolute errors between the extracted and manually measured geometric information are marginal. This demonstrates the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed extraction methods. Thus, the proposed framework could provide a reference for accurate extraction and modeling from LiDAR data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".