Development and characterization of new patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of osteosarcoma with distinct metastatic capacities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Models to study metastatic disease in rare cancers are needed to advance preclinical therapeutics and to gain insight into disease biology, especially for highly aggressive cancers with a propensity for metastatic spread. Osteosarcoma is a rare cancer with a complex genomic landscape in which outcomes for patients with metastatic disease are poor. As osteosarcoma genomes are highly heterogeneous, a large panel of models is needed to fully elucidate key aspects of disease biology and to recapitulate clinically-relevant phenotypes. We describe the development and characterization of osteosarcoma patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and a panel of PDX-derived cell lines. Matched patient samples, PDXs, and PDX-derived cell lines were comprehensively evaluated using whole genome sequencing and RNA sequencing. PDXs and PDX-derived cell lines largely maintained the expression profiles of the patient from which they were derived despite the emergence of whole-genome duplication (WGD) in a subset of cell lines. These cell line models were heterogeneous in their metastatic capacity and their tissue tropism as observed in both intravenous and orthotopic models. As proof-of-concept study, we used one of these models to test the preclinical effectiveness of a CDK inhibitor on the growth of metastatic tumors in an orthotopic amputation model. Single-agent dinaciclib was effective at dramatically reducing the metastatic burden in this model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".