<i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> BW2013 protects mucosal integrity and modulates gut microbiota of mice with colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explored the effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (previously Lactobacillus plantarum) BW2013 on mucosal integrity and gut microbiota of mice with dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis. The results show that the clinical symptoms in DSS-modelled ulcerative colitis (UC) were improved by L. plantarum BW2013 via decreasing disease activity index scores and suppressing inflammatory cell infiltration. Furthermore, L. plantarum BW2013 decreased the levels of diamine oxidase activity, myeloperoxidase, and D-lactic acid. The mRNA expression of ZO-1, occludin, and claudin-1 was upregulated by L. plantarum BW2013, which also increased IL-10 and reduced TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in the colon. 16S rDNA sequencing showed that L. plantarum BW2013 enhanced α-diversity. L. plantarum BW2013 upregulated significantly the abundance of unidentfied Lachnospiraceae, Lactococcus, Rikenella, Lactobacillus, and Odoribacter, which had an inhibitory effect on inflammation and a protective effect on the integrity of the mucosa. These results demonstrate that L. plantarum BW2013 alleviates DSS-modelled UC by protecting mucosal integrity and ameliorating the composition of gut microbiota.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".