Adsorption of sulfur on Lanxess Lewatit® AF 5 resin during the acidic albion leaching process for chalcopyrite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elemental sulfur is one of the major byproducts of the acidic Albion leaching process for chalcopyrite. It is a challenging component in the leach solution as it impedes gold recovery from the residue. Lanxess Lewatit® AF 5 (AF 5) is a microporous carbon-based resin, which is being investigated for the removal of elemental sulfur during this leaching process. In the current research, a series of leaching experiments were performed as a function of temperature, agitation speed and concentrate to AF 5 ratio. Using these results, the adsorption isotherms, the kinetics and the thermodynamics of sulfur removal were studied. One hundred percent of the elemental sulfur could be adsorbed by the AF 5 resin from the acidic Albion leaching process for chalcopyrite. Adsorption isotherms at various temperatures were determined using the Langmuir and Freundlich models. The maximum sorption capacity of AF 5 at 95 °C was 488 mg/g. The kinetic data were fitted to pseudo-first order (PFO) and pseudo-second order (PSO) models and it was shown that the PFO model was best suited to describe the results. The rapid kinetics of sulfur adsorption were attributed to the open pore structure of the AF 5. The Gibbs free energy, enthalpy and entropy of sulfur adsorption by AF 5 were determined as follows: ΔG ads o = −1.9 kJ/mol, ΔH ads o = −9.1 kJ/mol, and ΔS ads o = −0.1 kJ/(mol K). The negative free energy and enthalpy changes demonstrated that the adsorption of elemental sulfur was both spontaneous and exothermic over the temperature range studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".