Numerical investigation of large‐scale seasonal rock‐pit energy storage system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A twodimensional axisymmetric model, which is computationally inexpensive, has been proposed to predict the property changes that occur in a seasonal rock‐pit energy storage (RPES) system. The geometry of the rock‐pit has been simplified into a shape that can be extended for any seasonal storage system with a three‐dimensional conical geometry. The computational domain has been solved using both linear thermal equilibrium (LTE) and linear thermal non‐equilibrium (LTNE) models, and the former has been found to be computationally quick and accurate. The model has predicted a 95% energy saving at the highest flow conditions required in the mine. Further analysis has suggested that the increase in storage capacity by decreasing the porosity of rocks in the rock‐pit is insignificant compared to the corresponding increase in fan power. Furthermore, the investigation done on natural rocks has indicated an increased ability to store heat in the rock‐pit when rocks with higher thermal mass have been used. The use of RPES has shown a significant potential to reduce the carbon footprint. Finally, an economic analysis done on the system has shown a return on investment of just under 12 years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it