MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317625878 · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1143388

Editorial: The cold regions in transition: Impacts on soil and groundwater biogeochemistry

2023· editorial· en· W4317625878 on OpenAlexaff
Fereidoun Rezanezhad, Magdalena Bieroza, Alexandra R. Contosta, Philippe Van Cappellen

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Environmental Science · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiogeochemistryGroundwaterEnvironmental scienceEarth scienceSoil scienceEnvironmental chemistryGeologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cold regions in transition: Impacts on soil and groundwater biogeochemistryGlobal climate warming disproportionately affects the ecosystems of the high-latitude cold regions, which can facilitate agricultural expansion, urban growth, and natural resource development, adding growing anthropogenic pressures to cold regions' landscapes, soil health, and biodiversity (Hansen et al., 2010; IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2021;Pi et al., 2021).The terrestrial ecosystems in northern cold regions, including Arctic and subarctic regions, comprise components that are especially vulnerable to warming-snow cover and permafrost-as well as soil microbial communities adapted to cold temperatures.These changes are accompanied by changes in vegetation cover, the thermal regime of soils, fluxes, and timing of nutrient export to aquatic ecosystems, emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), and the mobilization of organic carbon and geogenic contaminants, among others (Edwards et al., 2007;Brooks et al., 2011;Hayashi, 2013;Kurylyk et al., 2014).Consequently, elucidating how these changes affect soil biogeochemical processes and fluxes is essential for predicting carbon and nutrient availability in subsurface and impacts on groundwater and surface water quality (Matzner et al., 2008;Cochand et al., 2019).For instance, the often-reported spring pulses of dissolved carbon and nutrients in cold regions' terrestrial ecosystems reflect the cumulated effects of hydro(bio)geochemical processes on the belowground pools of bioactive elements, the dynamic response of the soil microbial community to changes in hydrology and geochemistry that accompany spring snowmelt, and associated water quality and ecological impacts (Henry, 2007, Henry, 2008;Hayashi et al., 2013;Kurylyk et al., 2014;Lundberg et al., 2016).Thus, climate warming generates a set of interrelated changes in (hydro)geophysical properties, hydro(geo)logical flows, biogeochemical processes, and ecosystem functions in the world's cold regions.Research on how cold regions' microorganisms respond to shifts in environmental conditions is of particular importance for anticipating how a warming climate will affect the biogeochemical cycling of carbon, nutrients, metals, and pollutants in the Earth's cold regions.Quantifying the variability in cold region processes remains challenging but is, however, critical to unravel the linkages between climate warming and biogeochemical responses in cold climate ecosystems.The complex interconnections of hydro(bio)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0110.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Environmental ScienceSame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207