Gradient Based Simultaneous Structural and Kinematic Optimization of Landing Gear Members based on the Modified Input-Output Equation for Multibody Kinematics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-1672.vid Retractable landing gears are complex multidisciplinary systems. Under the demands of continuously accelerating product development timelines, computationally efficient design tools to finalize lightweight landing gear designs are in high demand. Simultaneous structural and kinematic optimization methodology has been developed in the past to design lightweight retractable landing gears with single-loop planar retraction mechanisms. The objective of this work is to extend previous capabilities with the addition of lock-link mechanisms, actuator performance considerations, enhanced bay constraints and out-of-plane load cases. In this work, retractable nose landing gear designs are generated using the proposed optimization methodology for 3 different commercial aircraft applications. In all cases, the optimizations converged successfully considering the complex mechanisms, new constraints, and loading scenarios. The results demonstrated that multidisciplinary design optimization methodology can accelerate the preliminary design phase of retractable nose landing gears with locking links, out-of-plane load cases and actuator performance also considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it