MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317639491 · doi:10.1017/9789048504138.005

Language maintenance and shift

2006· other· en· W4317639491 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When Dolly Pentreath died in December 1777, the last native speaker of Cornish passed away. Comishwas formerly spoken by thousands ofpeopie in Cornwall, but the community of Cornish speakers did not succeed in maintaining irs language under the pressure of English, the prestigious majority language and national language. Ta put it differently: rhe Cornish community shifted from Comish to English (cf. Pool, 1982). Such a process seems to be going on in many bilingual communities. More and more speakers use [he majcrity language in domains where they formerly spoke [he minoriry tongue. They adopt rhe majority language as their regular vehicle of communication, often mainly beceuse they expect that speaking that ianguage gives better chances for upward seclal mobility and economie success. As Dress1er and Wodak-Leodo1ter (1977:35) point out in an artiele on Ianguage preservation and death in Brittany (France): ‘it is necessary to present oneself as a member of rhe nauonal majority to acquire positions (like jobs, official functions and educational facilities﹜'. In such cases the minority Ianguage is in danger ofhecoming obsolescent. When a community stops speaking a minorhy language, of course this Ianguage win not always he extinguished. For example, if the Gujerati-speaking peop1e in England shifted to English cornplerely, Guierati wou1d not become a dead language. There are millions of speakers of Gujerati in other parts of rhe world, especially in India. For the (erstwhile) Gujerati community in England ir would he a dead language. Sometimes it seems that ‘shift’ can he equated with ‘shift towards the majority or prestigious Ianguage', hut in fact ‘shift’ is a neutral concept, and also shift towards the extended use of the minority Ianguage can be observed For examp1e, in rhe last decades French has strengthened its position in Quebec at the expense of English. After a period of shift towards the majority language, there is often a tendency to reverse the process, because some people come to realize that rhe minority language is disappearing, and they try to promote its use. These defenders of the minority language are often young, active members of cultural and politica1 organizations thar stand up for the social, economie and cultural interests ofthe minority group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and IdentityFrench-language works237,207