Letters of the highest ranking church officials to the author of the first volume of the History of the Serbian Orhtodox Church, Prof dr. Djoko Slijepcevic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The year 2022 marks the 60th anniversary of the publication of the first comprehen?sive History of the Serbian Orthodox Church. Its author, Professor of the Belgrade University - Dr. Djoko Slijepcevic, was an ecclesiastical historian who published this work as a political emigrant in Munich, from his own financial resources. Several highly ranked church dignitaries, including the Patriarch of the Serbian Orthodox Church (SOC), decided to send him letters of gratitude, even though well aware that all correspondence at the time had been under sur?veillance. The appendix of this work contains letters written by the Serbian Patriarch German Djoric, Bishop of Bachka Nikanor Ilichic, dissident and spiritual elder Archimandrite Prof Dr. Justin Popovic (who had been canonized as saint by the SOC), Archimandrite Dr. Firmilian Otsokolyic, as well as protopriest Stevan Lastavitsa. The last two had been later ordained as bishops of SOC in America and Canada in 1963. These short letters which express gratitude and recognition of the author`s diligent work across several decades provide an opportunity to understand how the highest ranking officials of the Church reacted to the publication of the exiled authors`s History of the Serbian Orthodox Church in emigration. Up until late 1980s, this work had been unwanted and hard to find in Yugoslavia and had not been accessible in the state libraries, nor at the historical Institutes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.086 | 0.041 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".