MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317728437 · doi:10.3390/ma16031012

Temperature and Aging Effects on the Rheological Properties and Performance of Geopolymer-Modified Asphalt Binder and Mixtures

2023· article· en· W4317728437 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdulrahman Hamid, Hassan Baaj, Mohab El-Hakim

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDynamic shear rheometerMaterials scienceAsphaltComposite materialRheologyRheometerGeopolymerCreepViscoelasticityCrumb rubberDynamic modulusFly ashDynamic mechanical analysisPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using geopolymer as a modifier for asphalt binders and mixtures gained momentum for investigation in recent decades. Limited research investigations attempted to link the effect of temperature and traffic loading on the rheological properties and performance of geopolymer-modified asphalt binders. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of fly ash-based geopolymer (GF), styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS), and the combination of GF with SBS on the rheological properties and performance of asphalt binders at low and intermediate temperatures. The rheological properties and performance of neat and modified asphalt binders (4%GF, 8%GF,12%GF, 2%SBS, and hybrid (2%SBS+8%GF)) were evaluated utilizing dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) and bending beam rheometer (BBR) devices. To evaluate the fatigue resistance of asphalt binders, the linear amplitude sweep (LAS) and viscoelastic continuum damage (VECD) models were applied. The dynamic or complex modulus and moisture damage resistance were measured to investigate the influence of modifiers on the performance of asphalt mixtures. The findings demonstrated that for both unaged and RTFO-aged asphalt binders, additives reduced the temperature sensitivity of both G' and G″. When the binders were exposed to long-term aging using a pressure aging vessel (PAV), it was noticed that the 8%GF binder became more susceptible to temperature changes. The 2%SBS binder had the lowest creep stiffness compared with the neat and other modifiers, while the hybrid binder exhibited the highest resistance to fatigue distress at different temperatures compared with the other binders. The modified asphalt mixes (8%GF, 2%SBS, and hybrid) achieved the maximum tensile strength (St) compared with the neat asphalt binder, with an increase of more than 80%. The St increased from 580.4 kPa to 740.4 kPa, 884.8 kPa, and 917.4 kPa by utilising the 8%GF, 2%SBS, and hybrid binders, respectively. Furthermore, the modified asphalt mixture exhibited more ability to resist cracking, attaining the highest fracture energy in dry and freeze-thaw conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterialsSame topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207