MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Using Simulation-Based Forecasting to Project Singapore's Future Residential Construction Demand and Impacts on Sustainability

2022· article· en· W4317792307 on OpenAlexaff
Elyar Pourrahimian, Malak Al Hattab, Salam Khalife, Mohamed ElMenshawy, Simaan AbouRizk

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSustainable Building Design and Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityEnvironmental economicsPlan (archaeology)Sustainable developmentDemand forecastingBusinessEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementEconomicsMarketingPolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Singapore's 2030 Green Plan aims to advance the nation's sustainable development agenda in alignment with rising global sustainability concerns. Accordingly, construction research is shifting its focus towards the sustainability impacts of the sector's practices. Residential construction, specifically, constitutes the majority of the sector's operations, energy use, and emissions while also having socio-economic impacts on all involved stakeholders. Therefore, this paper investigates demand trends and sustainable performance of the residential construction industry as an essential step towards achieving Singapore's sustainable development goals. As such, this research combines system dynamics modeling and forecasting techniques to (1) forecast the future demand of Singapore's residential sector by modeling the relationships between various influencing factors, and (2) predict the environmental and socio-economic impacts associated with the forecasted increase in demand. The research's value lies in harnessing the power of simulation-based forecasting to aid policy-makers in attaining informed evidence-based decisions regarding the industry's sustainable future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)Same topicSustainable Building Design and AssessmentFrench-language works237,207