Dual incorporation of non-canonical amino acids enables production of post-translationally modified selenoproteins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can occur on almost all amino acids in eukaryotes as a key mechanism for regulating protein function. The ability to study the role of these modifications in various biological processes requires techniques to modify proteins site-specifically. One strategy for this is genetic code expansion (GCE) in bacteria. The low frequency of post-translational modifications in bacteria makes it a preferred host to study whether the presence of a post-translational modification influences a protein’s function. Genetic code expansion employs orthogonal translation systems engineered to incorporate a modified amino acid at a designated protein position. Selenoproteins, proteins containing selenocysteine, are also known to be post-translationally modified. Selenoproteins have essential roles in oxidative stress, immune response, cell maintenance, and skeletal muscle regeneration. Their complicated biosynthesis mechanism has been a hurdle in our understanding of selenoprotein functions. As technologies for selenocysteine insertion have recently improved, we wanted to create a genetic system that would allow the study of post-translational modifications in selenoproteins. By combining genetic code expansion techniques and selenocysteine insertion technologies, we were able to recode stop codons for insertion of N ε -acetyl- l -lysine and selenocysteine, respectively, into multiple proteins. The specificity of these amino acids for their assigned position and the simplicity of reverting the modified amino acid via mutagenesis of the codon sequence demonstrates the capacity of this method to study selenoproteins and the role of their post-translational modifications. Moreover, the evidence that Sec insertion technology can be combined with genetic code expansion tools further expands the chemical biology applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".