MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4317815892 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.026014

Local observables in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>SU</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math> lattice gauge theory

2023· article· lv· W4317815892 on OpenAlexafffund
Valentin Bonzom, Maïté Dupuis, Florian Girelli, Qiaoyin Pan

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2023
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of WaterlooAgence Nationale de la RechercheOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceGovernment of CanadaInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
KeywordsObservableSpinorPhysicsMathematical physicsGauge theoryLattice gauge theoryLattice (music)Lattice field theoryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a deformation of 3D lattice gauge theory in the canonical picture, first classically, based on the Heisenberg double of $\mathrm{SU}(2)$, then at the quantum level. We show that classical spinors can be used to define a fundamental set of local observables. They are invariant quantities that live on the vertices of the lattice and are labeled by pairs of incident edges. Any function on the classical phase space, e.g., Wilson loops, can be rewritten in terms of these observables. At the quantum level, we show that spinors become spinor operators. The quantization of the local observables then requires the use of the quantum $\mathcal{R}$ matrix, which we prove to be equivalent to a specific parallel transport around the vertex. We provide the algebra of the local observables, as a Poisson algebra classically, then as a $q$ deformation of ${\mathfrak{so}}^{*}(2n)$ at the quantum level. This formalism can be relevant to any theory relying on lattice gauge theory techniques such as topological models, loop quantum gravity or of course lattice gauge theory itself.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.005
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesFrench-language works237,207