Prediction of Total Organic Carbon in Organic-Rich Shale Rocks Using Thermal Neutron Parameters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Total organic carbon (TOC) content is one of the crucial parameters that determine the value of the source rock. The TOC content gives important indications about the source rocks and hydrocarbon volume. Various techniques have been utilized for TOC quantification, either by geochemical analysis of source rocks in laboratories or using well logs to develop mathematical correlations and advanced machine learning models. Laboratory methods require intense sampling intervals to have an accurate understanding of the reservoir, and depending on the thickness of the interested formation, it can be time-consuming and costly. Empirical correlations based on well logs (e.g., density, sonic, gamma ray, and resistivity) showed fast predictions and very reasonable accuracies. However, other important parameters such as thermal neutron logs have not been studied yet as a potential input for providing reliable TOC predictions. Also, different studies estimate the TOC based on the well-logging data for various formations; however, limited studies were reported to predict the TOC for the Horn River Formation. Therefore, the objective of this study is to estimate the TOC variations based on the thermal neutron logs using one of the largest source rocks in Canada: The Horn River Formation. More than 150 data sets were collected and used in this work. The parameters of the artificial neural network (ANN) model were fine-tuned in order to improve the model's prediction performance. Furthermore, an empirical correlation was developed utilizing the optimized ANN model to allow fast and direct application for the developed model. The developed correlation can predict the TOC with an average absolute error of 0.52 wt %. The proposed TOC model was able to outperform the previous models, and the coefficient of determination was increased from 0.28 to 0.73. Overall, the proposed TOC model can provide high accuracy for TOC ranges from 0.3 to 6.44 wt %. The developed model can provide a real-time quantification for the organic matter maturity, helping to allocate the zones of mature organic matter within the drilled formations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".