Frailty Improvement by Multicomponent Drug, Ninjin’Yoeito, in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Alzheimer’s Disease Patients: An Open-Label Exploratory Study (FRAMINGO)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia have increasingly been conceived of as "complex diseases of aging", determined by multiple, simultaneous, interacting pathophysiological processes. The condition known as frailty is a phenotype of aging and its comprehensive pathophysiology is thought to be closely related to the incidence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and the exacerbation of dementia. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of the multicomponent drug, ninjin'yoeito (NYT), on frailty in MCI and mild AD patients. Methods: This study was an open-label trial. A total of 14 patients, including 9 with MCI and 5 with mild AD, were enrolled. Among them, 11 were frail while 3 were prefrail. NYT (6-9 g/day) was administered orally for 24 weeks, and assessments were carried out at baseline (week 0), and at 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks. Results: In the primary endpoint, significant early improvements were observed in the anorexia scores according to the Neuropsychiatric Inventory after four weeks of treatment with NYT. The Cardiovascular Health Study score was significantly improved, and no frailty was observed after 24 weeks. The fatigue visual analog scale scores also significantly improved. The Clinical Dementia Rating and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores remained at baseline levels during the NYT treatment period. Conclusion: The results suggest that NYT may be effective in the treatment of frailty, especially for anorexia and fatigue, in both MCI and mild AD patients, which would be beneficial for the prognosis of dementia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".