Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polyphosphate (polyP) is a conserved polymer of inorganic phosphate residues that can reach thousands of moieties in length. PolyP has been implicated in cellular functions ranging from energy and phosphate homeostasis to cell signalling in eukaryotes from yeast to humans. Despite the interest in the role of polyP as a signalling molecule, the spatiotemporal regulation of polyP itself remains poorly understood. This knowledge gap limits our ability to understand how polyP impacts the physiology of normal and diseased cells and how this might be exploited in a therapeutic context. Polyphosphatases, enzymes that degrade polyP to generate shorter chains and free inorganic phosphate are ideally positioned to mediate polyP dynamics. However, little is known about how the activities of these enzymes are linked to specific cellular functions and how they might be regulated. Here, we provide an in-depth overview of polyphosphatase enzymes in budding yeast, which has served as a workhorse for polyP research, and in mammalian cells where the enzymes that make and degrade polyP have remained elusive. We identify critical open questions in both systems and propose strategies to guide future work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".