MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4317895468 · doi:10.1370/afm.21.s1.4006

The Importance of Proximity in the Social Network of Older Persons Living Alone During the Pandemic

2023· article· en· W4317895468 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nadia Sourial, Élise Develay, Amélie Quesnel‐Vallée, Paul Holyoke, Lise Dassieu, Patrick Archambault, Claire Godard‐Sebillotte, Sathya Karunananthan, Svetlana Puzhko

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLonelinessSocial isolationThematic analysisPandemicPsychologyGerontologyAutonomyMental healthSocial connectednessContext (archaeology)Qualitative researchMedicineSocial psychologySociologyPsychiatryCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DiseasePolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context The COVID-19 pandemic may have particularly impacted older adults living alone who are at increased risk of social isolation and its negative consequences. This risk may have been further exacerbated due to public health measures and disruption of services and social support. Objective This study aimed to understand the experiences and social connectedness of older persons living alone during the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec. Study design A qualitative study with 14 semi-structured interviews was conducted by telephone. The first part of the interview guide focused on social isolation and perceptions of loneliness, while the second part focused on of their perceived impact of the pandemic on their health and social network during the third to the fourth wave of the pandemic. Two independent analysts used Dedoose® software to conduct an inductive thematic analysis based on the transcribed interviews. Population studied Persons aged 65 and over living alone. Setting An urban (Montreal) and semi-rural (Chaudière-Appalaches) region of Quebec, Canada. Results We suggest two preliminary themes from our analysis: (1) autonomy and adaptability in the face of the pandemic, (2) the importance of social connections and services in close proximity. Despite challenges posed by the pandemic participants consistently reported a strong desire to limit burden to their family and pride in maintaining their autonomy. While some participants reported a deterioration in their physical and mental health due to the confinement measures, most reported little impact on their sense of loneliness. The fact that they had already been living alone for several years helped them to readily adapt. Day-to-day interactions with their immediate environment (neighbors, pharmacist, etc.) and helping others (accompanying friends, organizing social activities, etc.) within this network were consistently found to be important coping mechanisms. Conclusions Neighborhood contacts and services in close proximity were found to be important elements in promoting the well-being of older persons living alone. Health professionals should consider the importance of social interactions in close proximity when caring for older persons living alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealth disparities and outcomes→French-language works237,207→