Somatosensory and motor representations following bilateral transplants of the hands: A 6-year longitudinal case report on the first pediatric bilateral hand transplant patient
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A vascularized composite tissue allotransplantation (VCA) was performed at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), on an 8-year-old patient in 2015, six years after bilateral hand and foot amputation. Hand VCA resulted in reafferentation of the medial, ulnar, and radial nerves serving hand somatosensation and motor function. We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to assess somatosensory cortical plasticity following the post-transplantation recovery of the peripheral sensory nerves of the hands. Our 2-year postoperative MEG showed that somatosensory lip representations, initially observed at "hand areas", reverted to canonical, orthotopic lip locations with recovery of post-transplant hand function. Here, we continue the assessment of motor and somatosensory responses up to 6-years post-transplant. Magnetoencephalographic somatosensory responses were recorded eight times over a six-year period following hand transplantation, using a 275-channel MEG system. Somatosensory tactile stimuli were presented to the right lower lip (all 8 visits) as well as right and left index fingers (visits 3-8) and fifth digits (visits 4-8). In addition, left and right-hand motor responses were also recorded for left index finger and right thumb (visit 8 only).During the acute recovery phase (visits 3 and 4), somatosensory responses of the digits were observed to be significantly larger and more phasic (i.e., smoother) than controls. Subsequent measures showed that digit responses maintain this atypical response profile (evoked-response magnitudes typically exceed 1 picoTesla). Orthotopic somatosensory localization of the lip, D2, and D5 was preserved. Motor beta-band desynchrony was age-typical in localization and response magnitude; however, the motor gamma-band response was significantly larger than that observed in a reference population.These novel findings show that the restoration of somatosensory input of the hands resulted in persistent and atypically large cortical responses to digit stimulation, which remain atypically large at 6 years post-transplant; there is no known perceptual correlate, and no reports of phantom pain. Normal somatosensory organization of the lip, D2, and D5 representation remain stable following post-recovery reorganization of the lip's somatosensory response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".