MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prediction Model Based on Easily Available Markers for Aberrant Cardiac Remodeling in Women After Pregnancy

2023· article· en· W4317934740 on OpenAlexaff
Zenab Mohseni, Emma B N J Janssen, Jil Delmarque, Sander M. J. van Kuijk, Marc E. A. Spaanderman, Chahinda Ghossein‐Doha

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsDelmar (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyPreeclampsiaLeft ventricular hypertrophyReceiver operating characteristicBlood pressurePopulationPregnancyHeart failureVentricular remodelingWaistCohortBody mass index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is strongly associated with left ventricular concentric remodeling (LVCR) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) up to 10 years after delivery. This predisposes to heart failure later in life. Adequate detection and prediction of LVCR or LVH is expected to decrease the risk of developing clinical heart failure within this high-risk female population. Therefore, we developed and internally validated a prediction model for aberrant cardiac remodeling in formerly pregnant women. METHODS: This large cohort study included women with a history of preeclampsia or normotensive pregnancy within a postpartum interval of 6 months to 30 years. Cardiovascular assessment was performed, including echocardiography, 30-minute blood pressure measurements, and circulating biomarkers. Aberrant cardiac remodeling based on echocardiographic findings was defined as either LVCR or LVH. Discriminative performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: A total of 1397 women were included, of which 139 (10%) with LVCR or LVH (mean±SD age, 43±9 years) and 1258 (90%) without LVCR or LVH (40±8 years). The final prediction model was established based on the predictors age, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin, antihypertensive medication use, and early onset preeclampsia (yes/no). After internal validation, the prediction model showed accurate discriminative ability with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.702 (95% CI, 0.657-0.756). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the conventional predictors, we developed a prediction model for women who are on average 8 to 12 years postpartum. Internal validation showed accurate discriminative ability. Upon external validation, this model may aid clinicians to initiate further diagnostic testing or clinical follow-up. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02347540.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyFrench-language works237,207