Ridge Gap Waveguide Beamforming Components and Antennas for Millimeter-Wave Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the improvement of mobile communication technologies and their broad applications, mobile communication will have more impact on our life. Such systems will support a variety of personal communication services with high-data rate and very low latency applications. To achieve such demands, many proposals associated with the development of 5G identify a set of requirements for which different technological directions are independently emerging. One direction is utilizing the millimeter-wave (mm-Wave) frequency bands where more spectrums are available. Millimeter-wave frequencies offer the advantage of physically smaller components that results in cost-effective RF transceivers and feasible large-scale integrated phased arrays. The smart RF transceivers of 5G along with the potential high-frequency innovative designs must satisfy the growing consumer and technology requirements. This implies utilizing the state-of-the-art guiding structures, especially printed ridge gap waveguide (PRGW), that have low loss and minimal dispersion compared with traditional PCB-based structures. The present chapter focuses on the necessary components for a beamforming antenna system which is implemented using PRGW technology. Millimeter wave antennas with different polarizations have been addressed. Power combining and dividing components have been also developed. These components have been used for integration in a complete beamforming antenna system working at an mm-Wave frequency band.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it