Genomically Informed Custom Selective Enrichment of Shiga Toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) Outbreak Strains in Foods Using Antibiotics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) have been implicated in major foodborne outbreaks worldwide. The STEC family of pathogens is biochemically diverse, and current microbiological methods for detecting STEC are limited by the lack of a universal selective enrichment approach and prone to interference by high levels of background microbiota associated with certain types of foods. A novel approach has been developed for the recovery of foodborne illness outbreak strains during outbreak investigations based on the analysis of whole genome sequence data of implicated clinical isolates to determine antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. The presence of certain AMR genes in STEC has been correlated with the ability to grow in the presence of a specific antibiotic, which can be used to supplement enrichment broths to improve the recovery of a target strain. The enhanced recovery of STEC strains with different AMR profiles from various food types (beef, sprouts, leafy greens, and raw milk cheese) containing high levels of background microbiota was demonstrated using AMR predictions for nine different antibiotics. This genomically informed custom selective enrichment approach increases the availability of analytical options and improves the reliability of food microbiological analyses in confirming food vehicles implicated in outbreak events and defining the scope of product contamination to support risk assessment and risk management actions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".