Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dermatitis®Vol. 34, No. 6 LettersOleyl Alcohol May Be an Overlooked Allergen in Pimecrolimus CreamKlaus Ejner AndersenKlaus Ejner AndersenDepartment of Dermatology, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense 5000, Denmark E-mail Address: [email protected]https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6181-824XSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:16 Nov 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/derm.2022.0082AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookXLinked InRedditEmail View article"Oleyl Alcohol May Be an Overlooked Allergen in Pimecrolimus Cream." Dermatitis®, 34(6), p. 564FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 34Issue 6Dec 2023 Information© 2023 American Contact Dermatitis Society. All Rights Reserved.To cite this article:Klaus Ejner Andersen.Oleyl Alcohol May Be an Overlooked Allergen in Pimecrolimus Cream.Dermatitis®.Dec 2023.564-564.http://doi.org/10.1089/derm.2022.0082Published in Volume: 34 Issue 6: November 16, 2023Online Ahead of Print:January 19, 2023PDF download
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".