MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318218909 · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202336601017

Evaluation of the interFoam solver in the prediction of immiscible two-phase flow in imbibition and drainage on the pore-doublet system

2023· article· en· W4318218909 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueE3S Web of Conferences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersHibernia Management and Development CompanyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsPetroleum Research Newfoundland and Labrador
KeywordsImbibitionCapillary actionWettingMechanicsContact angleMultiphase flowFlow (mathematics)SolverDisplacement (psychology)Scale (ratio)Materials scienceDrainageSurface tensionGeologyGeotechnical engineeringComposite materialComputer sciencePhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drainage and imbibition at low to moderate capillary number, are very important phenomena, in which the SCAL data are derived. In this venue, there is an increasing trend to apply computational fluid dynamic models at pore scale to extract the required parameters for multiphase flow study. Before applying these methods, their abilities to capture the real performance of fluids at the pore scale with corresponding capillary numbers should be validated. Moreover, due to the dimensional difference from pore to core scale, rigorous statistical methods are required to successfully extract the corresponding SCAL parameters. Hence for any model, before constructing any SCAL data via digital methods, validation at the pore scale along with the investigation of the possible effect of the dimensional change from pore to core scale are significant priorities. In this study, the performance of interFoam, a solver for immiscible two-phase flow from OpenFOAM, at the pore scale is evaluated. An image of the pore doublet system is digitized and meshed with different resolutions to capture the contact angle movement. The average pore diameters are different, and the pore diameter pathway varies. The experimental results are extracted from an article, which extensively performed the tests for different imbibition and drainage regime on this pore doublet system. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis on mesh geometry, refinement near boundaries, and contact angle is conducted. The drainage simulation and experimental results in the pore doublet system are in good agreement with each other. As expected, the displacement happens in the larger diameter and bypasses the wetting fluid in the narrow constriction. In imbibition, the displacement first takes place in the smaller constriction and then the wetting phase starts invading the larger diameter pore. From the sensitivity analysis, it is concluded that the instability of the front is mainly related to the slip condition at the walls. Moreover, the spreading of wetting film near the wall is prevalent at very low contact angles. The results show that the solver can predict the flow behavior in imbibition and drainage on the pore doublet system and the results are comparable with the experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it