MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318338001 · doi:10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i11588

Environmental and Health Effects of SONICHAR'S Coal Mining Activities in Tchirozérine (Niger)

2023· article· en· W4318338001 on OpenAlex
Abdou Gado Fanna, Dan Guimbo Iro, Wada Faylatou, Tankari Dan Badjo Abdourahamane, Guéro Yadji

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environment and Climate Change · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoal miningDesertificationContext (archaeology)Environmental protectionDirectiveEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental impact assessmentBiodiversityCoalPopulationEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningGeographyEngineeringWaste managementEnvironmental healthEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The environmental challenge is relatively high in an ecologically fragile area like the Sahel, which has to deal with the phenomena of desertification and loss of biodiversity in which the rural, poor population depends on the natural environment for its survival. Indeed, Niger has a coal basin of Iullemneden; this mineral coal deposit has been exploited since 1978 for the production of electrical energy. This implies a challenge of preserving the environment and its natural resources. It is in this context that the present study aims to analyze the impacts of coal mining and its transformation by SONICHAR on the environment, the health of the populations living near Tchirozérine in order to propose preventive measures, reduction and mitigation. In order to achieve this objective, the methodology adopted for the study consisted of surveys, site visits and field observations. Also, samples of wastewater from the company were collected, transported and analyzed. Directive 019 of March 2011 from Quebec, served as a supporting document for the comparison between the activities carried out by the company and the mining standards. The analysis of the company's activities has shown that most of the company's activities do not comply with the mining standards explicitly mentioned in the Quebec Directive 019. All of the impacts on the physical components of the environment are major impacts, thus calling into question their integrity. The soils and the atmosphere are the units most affected by the activities of this plant. The physico-chemical analysis of the water sample taken showed that this water has concentrations of iron (1.9 mg/l) in fluoride (2.32 mg/l), its alkalinity (510 mg/l) and bicarbonate (612 mg/l). This shows that the concentration of these elements exceeds the standards. As for the population, the impact on the latter can be described as medium impact. The inhabitants have a remarkable awareness of the environmental and health risks they incur. With more than 46% claiming to have noticed the deterioration of their health. Even those who do not complain about the deterioration of their health, attribute the cause of certain observed diseases such as eye and lung diseases to the activities of the factory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it