MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318347735 · doi:10.1103/37vw-gc1r

Oscillating Nuclear Charge Radii as Sensors for Ultralight Dark Matter

2025· preprint· en· W4318347735 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Abhishek Banerjee, Dmitry Budker, Melina Filzinger, Nils Huntemann, Gil Paz, Gilad Pérez, S. G. Porsev, M. S. Safronova

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMaurice and Vivienne Wohl Charitable FoundationAzrieli FoundationIsrael Science FoundationEuropean Research CouncilNational Science FoundationGerman-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and DevelopmentHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeMax-Planck-GesellschaftDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMinerva Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAxionQuantum chromodynamicsScalar (mathematics)Particle physicsQuadrupoleDark matterElectric chargeQuarkCharge (physics)Effective nuclear chargeCoupling constantAtomic physicsIonQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that coupling of ultralight dark matter (UDM) to quarks and gluons would lead to an oscillation of the nuclear charge radius for both the quantum chromodynamic (QCD) axion and scalar dark matter, an effect which is of particular importance for heavy elements. Consequently, the resulting oscillation of electronic energy levels could be resolved with optical atomic clocks, and their comparisons can be used to investigate UDM nuclear couplings, which were previously only accessible with other platforms. We demonstrate this idea using the <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:msub> <a:mrow> <a:mmultiscripts> <a:mrow> <a:mi>S</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mprescripts/> <a:none/> <a:mrow> <a:mn>2</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:mmultiscripts> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mn>1</a:mn> <a:mo>/</a:mo> <a:mn>2</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:msub> <a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo> <a:mi>F</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>0</a:mn> <a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo> <a:mo stretchy="false">↔</a:mo> <a:msub> <a:mrow> <a:mmultiscripts> <a:mrow> <a:mi>F</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mprescripts/> <a:none/> <a:mrow> <a:mn>2</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:mmultiscripts> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mn>7</a:mn> <a:mo>/</a:mo> <a:mn>2</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:msub> <a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo> <a:mi>F</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>3</a:mn> <a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:math> electric octupole and <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <h:mrow> <h:msub> <h:mrow> <h:mmultiscripts> <h:mrow> <h:mi>S</h:mi> </h:mrow> <h:mprescripts/> <h:none/> <h:mrow> <h:mn>2</h:mn> </h:mrow> </h:mmultiscripts> </h:mrow> <h:mrow> <h:mn>1</h:mn> <h:mo>/</h:mo> <h:mn>2</h:mn> </h:mrow> </h:msub> <h:mo stretchy="false">(</h:mo> <h:mi>F</h:mi> <h:mo>=</h:mo> <h:mn>0</h:mn> <h:mo stretchy="false">)</h:mo> <h:mo stretchy="false">↔</h:mo> <h:msub> <h:mrow> <h:mmultiscripts> <h:mrow> <h:mi>D</h:mi> </h:mrow> <h:mprescripts/> <h:none/> <h:mrow> <h:mn>2</h:mn> </h:mrow> </h:mmultiscripts> </h:mrow> <h:mrow> <h:mn>3</h:mn> <h:mo>/</h:mo> <h:mn>2</h:mn> </h:mrow> </h:msub> <h:mo stretchy="false">(</h:mo> <h:mi>F</h:mi> <h:mo>=</h:mo> <h:mn>2</h:mn> <h:mo stretchy="false">)</h:mo> </h:mrow> </h:math> electric quadrupole transitions in <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <o:mrow> <o:mmultiscripts> <o:mrow> <o:msup> <o:mrow> <o:mi>Yb</o:mi> </o:mrow> <o:mrow> <o:mo>+</o:mo> </o:mrow> </o:msup> </o:mrow> <o:mprescripts/> <o:none/> <o:mrow> <o:mn>171</o:mn> </o:mrow> </o:mmultiscripts> </o:mrow> </o:math> . Based on the derived sensitivity coefficients for these two transitions and a long-term comparison of their frequencies using a single trapped <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <q:mrow> <q:mmultiscripts> <q:mrow> <q:msup> <q:mrow> <q:mi>Yb</q:mi> </q:mrow> <q:mrow> <q:mo>+</q:mo> </q:mrow> </q:msup> </q:mrow> <q:mprescripts/> <q:none/> <q:mrow> <q:mn>171</q:mn> </q:mrow> </q:mmultiscripts> </q:mrow> </q:math> ion, we find bounds on the scalar UDM-nuclear couplings and the QCD axion decay constant. These results are at a similar level compared to the tightest spectroscopic limits, and future investigations, also with other optical clocks, promise significant improvements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207