MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318407016 · doi:10.29011/2575-9760.001713

Prospective-Controlled Assessment of Stress Hormones and Pain In Patients Undergoing Myomectomy as Performed by Laparoscopy Against Laparotomy

2023· article· en· W4318407016 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
George Pados, Konstantinos Kantrantsiotis, Dimitrios Tsolakidis, Konstantinos Almaloglou, Spiros Gerou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Surgery · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTherapeutic Uses of Natural Elements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaparotomyMedicineLaparoscopyHormoneProspective cohort studySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction:In this prospective study we assessed the surgical stress and post-operative pain through the determination of stress hormones and patient discomfort, as well as the comparison of the stress hormones' response after myomectomy performed by laparoscopy versus laparotomy Methods: In this prospective matched case control study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2), which was performed in the Gynecological Department of University Hospital and Centre for Gynecological Endoscopy Private Hospital, sixty women with symptomatic growth of known uterine leiomyomas or leiomyomas compromising the shape of the uterus, were operated.Thirty women underwent laparoscopic myomectomy and thirty removal of leiomyomas through laparotomy.Three venous samples were received from each patient for determination of stress hormones (one before surgery, the second at the end of the surgical procedure and the third on the morning of the first postoperative day) and a questionnaire was administered the first post-operative day, in which the patients indicated the level of pain through a Visual Analog Scale of Pain (VASP).The main outcome measures were assessment of stress hormones and patient discomfort between the two groups on the first post-operative day.Results: Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) and noradrenalin were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group on the first post-operative day (12.68±9.97pg/ml vs 15.90±9.02pg/ml p<0.025) and 20.7±7.28 ng/ml vs 22.33±5.82ng/ml, (p<0.027)respectively.No statistical difference was observed in cortisol levels on the first post-operative day (11.71±5.82μg/dl vs 11.81±7.61μg/dl, p>0.94).and, also, for b-endorphin levels (4.88±1.57vs 4.91± ng/ml, p>0.61).Postoperative pain was significantly lower in the laparoscopy group on the V.A.S.P scale (3.3±1.05vs 5.67±1.15respectively, p<0.001).Conclusions: laparoscopy is superior to laparotomy for the surgical removal of leiomyomas in terms of postoperative pain and surgical stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of SurgerySame topicTherapeutic Uses of Natural ElementsFrench-language works237,207