An Evaluation of Authoritative Parenting Style Through Comparative Discussion of Autonomy Support and Psychological Control: Inspired by the Success of Eileen Gu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the overnight sensation of Eileen Gu, a prominent youth Olympic freestyle skiing Champion, has won much attention over the globe, the discussion of western and eastern parenting styles and the question of how to raise an outstanding adolescent have become a trending topic in Chinese social media. This paper aims to justify the favorable role of authoritative parenting style under the comparison of psychological control on adolescents’ academic functioning and psychological wellbeing, particularly exemplified by the success of Eileen Gu. By examining prior research conducted on western and eastern adolescents, mainly Chinese adolescents from eastern society, the distinctive cultural values and Chinese educational system contributed to the prevailing adoption of psychological control by Chinese parents compared to their western counterparts. Autonomy support was shown to have consistent positive effects on adolescents’ wellbeing in multiple dimensions across different cultures, whereas psychological control was shown to have destructive effects on western adolescents and nuanced effects but mainly negative on Chinese adolescents. This paper reassures that parents should adopt authoritative parenting style given its universal benefits to adolescents 'development in any cultural context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".