Associations between spontaneous electroencephalogram oscillations and oxygen saturation across normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract High‐altitude indoctrination (HAI) trains individuals to recognize symptoms of hypoxia by simulating high‐altitude conditions using normobaric (NH) or hypobaric (HH) hypoxia. Previous studies suggest that despite equivalent inspired oxygen levels, physiological differences could exist between these conditions. In particular, differences in neurophysiological responses to these conditions are not clear. Our study aimed to investigate correlations between oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) and neural responses in NH and HH. We recorded 5‐min of resting‐state eyes‐open electroencephalogram (EEG) and SpO 2 during control, NH, and HH conditions from 13 participants. We applied a multivariate framework to characterize correlations between SpO 2 and EEG measures (spectral power and multiscale entropy [MSE]), within each participant and at the group level. Participants were desaturating during the first 150 s of NH versus steadily desaturated in HH. We considered the entire time interval, first and second half intervals, separately. All the conditions were characterized by statistically significant participant‐specific patterns of EEG–SpO 2 correlations. However, at the group level, the desaturation period expressed a robust pattern of these correlations across frequencies and brain locations. Specifically, the first 150 s of NH during desaturation differed significantly from the other conditions with negative absolute alpha power–SpO 2 correlations and positive MSE–SpO 2 correlations. Once steadily desaturated, NH and HH had no significant differences in EEG–SpO 2 correlations. Our findings indicate that the desaturating phase of hypoxia is a critical period in HAI courses, which would require developing strategies for mitigating the hypoxic stimulus in a real‐world situation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".