MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318477627 · doi:10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100560

SCAI Expert Consensus Statement on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Without On-Site Surgical Backup

2023· article· en· W4318477627 on OpenAlexaff
Cindy L. Grines, Lyndon C. Box, Mamas Mamas, J. Dawn Abbott, James C. Blankenship, Jeffrey G. Carr, Nick Curzen, William Kent, Yazan Khatib, Alexis Matteau, Jennifer A. Rymer, Theodore L. Schreiber, Poonam Velagapudi, Mladen I. Vidovich, Stephen W. Waldo, Arnold H. Seto

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersMedtronicAbbott Laboratories
KeywordsConventional PCIMedicineBackupPercutaneous coronary interventionPsychological interventionCoronary angiographyStatement (logic)PercutaneousIntensive care medicineMedical emergencySurgeryCardiologyNursingMyocardial infarctionComputer scienceDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although once considered high-risk and below the standard of care, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without on-site surgical backup has been performed with acceptable outcomes since the 1980s.1 An initial consensus document on PCI without surgery on site (no-SOS) was published by Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) in 2007 and updated in 2014.2,3 The 2014 document summarized new literature, reviewed existing guidelines and other publications related to PCI with no-SOS, and recommended best practices and requirements for facilities performing PCI with no-SOS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.243
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsSame topicCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207