MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318483104 · doi:10.1103/physreve.107.014138

Resolving entropy contributions in nonequilibrium transitions

2023· article· en· W4318483104 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Benjamin Sorkin, Joshua Ricouvier, Haim Diamant, Gil Ariel

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAzrieli FoundationIsrael Science Foundation
KeywordsNon-equilibrium thermodynamicsStatistical physicsPhysicsCrossoverEntropy (arrow of time)Formalism (music)Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)Classical mechanicsThermodynamicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive a functional for the entropy contributed by any microscopic degrees of freedom as arising from their measurable pair correlations. Applicable both in and out of equilibrium, this functional yields the maximum entropy which a system can have given a certain correlation function. When applied to different correlations, the method allows us to identify the degrees of freedom governing a certain physical regime, thus capturing and characterizing dynamic transitions. The formalism applies also to systems whose translational invariance is broken by external forces and whose number of particles may vary. We apply it to experimental results for jammed bidisperse emulsions, capturing the crossover of this nonequilibrium system from crystalline to disordered hyperuniform structures as a function of mixture composition. We discover that the cross-correlations between the positions and sizes of droplets in the emulsion play the central role in the formation of the disordered hyperuniform states. We discuss implications of the approach for entropy estimation out of equilibrium and for characterizing transitions in disordered systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. ESame topicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsFrench-language works237,207