Blown film stability for low, medium, and high molecular weight polylactic acid and their tensile properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three poly (lactic acid) (PLA) resins with molecular weight (Mw) equal to 55 (3251D), 125 (L105) and 163 (LX175) kg/mol were characterized in terms of capillary viscosity, mechanical and thermal properties and used to produce blown films. The effect of temperature, extrusion rate, stretching (TUR) and blow-up (BUR) ratios were evaluated to determine the optimum processing conditions for blown films based on the bubble stability and to determine their final tensile properties. As expected, the processing temperature was the most critical parameter on the film stability. The lower Mw PLA showed limited processing stability. Stable conditions were found at higher temperature (200°C) for higher Mw. These results correlate with the PLA viscosity (melt strength). Finally, the PLA film tensile strength (TS) strongly depended on their processability. For example, 3251D and L105 required high stretching (TUR = 3.4 and 7) for maximum TS (30 and 64 MPa) with a low blow-up ratio (BUR = 1.02–1.15). However, a moderate increase in BUR (10% at TUR = 3) led to a substantial drop in TS (from 29 MPa to 21 MPa for PLA 3251D and 44 MPa–34 MPa for L105). Overall, LX175 was the most interesting resin with 49 MPa TS which was independent of the BUR and TUR used in this investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".