MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4318539232 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac190.1024

P894 Diagnostic yield of routine stool pathogen tests during the relapse of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2023· article· en· W4318539232 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vivian Huang, A Albadrani, Mishal A. Alshowair

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineColitisMedical recordDiseaseDemographicsRetrospective cohort studyPopulationCrohn's diseaseGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background To make the diagnosis of Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) flare, it is traditionally necessary to exclude infectious colitis, including bacteria and parasites. Furthermore, Infectious colitis prevalence varies between geographic areas of the world. It has been a routine clinical practice of sending broad stool testing and cultures to the laboratory before starting targeted therapy for IBD flare. The purpose of this study is to examine the yield of stool testing in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease flare. Methods It is a retrospective study. We reviewed the medical records of the admitted patients with IBD flare at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada between October 2018, and August 2019. We used a computer-generated list of patients admitted with a diagnosis of IBD. We excluded patients with no confirmed diagnosis of IBD or admitted for reasons other than IBD flare. A number of variables were recorded, such as the patient's demographics, concurrent and previous IBD therapy, steroid use, presenting symptoms, vital signs, and the results of the initial laboratory investigation Results This study included 96 adult patients admitted with IBD flare. A total of ninety-four of our samples were tested for C. difficile at the time of admission. Only 9.4% were positive for C. difficile. Six of them had ulcerative colitis and three had Crohn’s disease. The percentage of patients evaluated with stool cultures was 86%, while the percentage of patients evaluated for ova and parasites was 51% at the time of patient admission. Only 34% of the population had colonic biopsies stained for Cytomegalovirus (CMV) of which 74% had ulcerative colitis. None of the stool cultures nor CMV tests were positive in our population. The risk of acquiring C difficile infection was not significantly correlated with the patient's disease phenotype, the biological therapy they were receiving, or their smoking history. In our sample, clinical tests and routine laboratory tests did not predict infectious colitis. The CRP level, as well as the neutrophil and eosinophil counts, were not associated with positive C. difficile infection. Conclusion In IBD flare, we did not routinely identify pathogens besides C difficile. Aside from areas where bacterial or parasitic infections are prevalent, routine stool testing with cultures and parasites has a low yield.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→