P242 Universal exclusion of patients with Permanent Ileostomy in Crohn’s disease clinical trials: A systematic review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Crohn’s disease (CD) can be progressive leading to complications such as strictures and fistula requiring surgery in up to 50% of patients within 10 years of diagnosis and increased risk of permanent ileostomy (PI) formation. Approximately one third of patients with PI experience clinical recurrence within the small bowel which may need medical therapy and 16% significant recurrence requiring further surgery. Despite the physical and psychological morbidity associated with PI formation, there is a paucity of research in patients with CD and PI. We performed a systematic review to investigate whether patients with CD and PI were eligible to take part in pharmaceutical clinical trials. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library (CENTRAL) databases were searched from inception to April 2022 for randomized, placebo-controlled induction and maintenance trials of biologics and small molecules in adult patients with active CD. Eligibility criteria of included studies were screened by two authors independently. The primary outcome was to determine the proportion of trials that included patients with CD and a PI. Trial characteristics such as number of participants, mean age, sex, trial phase, class of drug, inclusion, or exclusion of patients with ostomy were collected. Results After excluding duplicates 11693 records from databases and additional sources were selected for screening. In total,144 records were assessed for full text assessment and 81 studies (induction: 58 and maintenance: 23) which enrolled 22000 participants were considered eligible (Table 1). The majority were phase 2 trials (n=41, 50.6%), 86.4% (n=70) evaluated efficacy and safety of biologics and the remaining studies (n=11, 13.6%) evaluated oral small molecules. Amongst the induction trials, 39 (67.2%) specifically stated that they excluded patients with an ostomy and the remaining studies (n=19, 32.8%) did not comment. For maintenance trials, 16 (69.6%) stated that they excluded patients with an ostomy and the remaining seven (30.4%) studies did not comment. Twenty-one induction studies and thirteen maintenance studies reported the proportion of patients with prior intestinal resection which ranged from 2.4% to 51%. No clinical trial included patients with a PI. Conclusion Patients with CD and PI have been excluded from pharmaceutical trials of biologics and small molecules to date. This group represents a high-risk patient population that have developed penetrating disease and may require medical therapy to prevent and treat recurrence. There is an urgent need to identify barriers to enrolment and develop eligibility and outcome measures that enable inclusion of patients with CD and PI into clinical trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.031 | 0.111 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.018 | 0.012 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".