MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4318539599 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac190.0707

P577 A Phase 1b Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Efficacy of the Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, Leucine rich Repeat containing X1 (NLRX1) agonist NX-13 in Ulcerative Colitis

2023· article· en· W4318539599 on OpenAlexaff
Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Silvio Danese, J F Colombel, F Rieder, Andrés Yarur, Bram Verstockt, S Lichtiger, Rebecca Mosig, F Cataldi, B G Feagan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUlcerative colitisMedicinePharmacokineticsAdverse effectTolerabilityInternal medicinePrednisoneClinical trialPharmacologyGastroenterologyPlaceboPhases of clinical researchClinical endpointDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background NLRX1 is a mitochondrial membrane protein whose activation reduces oxidative stress and decreases effector cell differentiation and cytokine release. NX-13 is a first-in-class, orally active, gut selective NLRX1 agonist with low systemic exposure. In preclinical studies of IBD, NX-13 effectively reduced inflammatory responses and disease severity. A phase 1a study (healthy subjects) showed NX-13 to be well tolerated with low systemic drug exposure suggesting a gut-selective drug delivery. We report the results of a phase 1b study in patients with Ulcerative colitis (UC) on the safety, target engagement and clinical efficacy of NX-13. Methods In this double-blind trial, 36 patients with active UC (Total Mayo Score [MCS] 4-10; Mayo endoscopic subscore [MES] 2-3) were randomly assigned to NX-13 250mg Immediate Release (IR), 500mg IR, 500mg Modified Release (MR) or Placebo to be taken QD for 4 weeks (safety visit at week 5). Biologic exposed patients, stable 5’ASAs dose and corticosteroids (oral ≤20mg/day prednisone or equivalent) were permitted. IV or topical corticosteroids use was prohibited. Primary endpoints were safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. The study was not powered for clinical efficacy, however MCS, histopathologic Geboes score, and NLRX1, cytokine, and gene expression were obtained at baseline and day 28 in exploratory analyses (Table 1). Results During the 5-week observation period, no serious adverse events (AEs) were reported. All AEs were classified as mild or moderate and were most common in the 500mg MR group. One patient was withdrawn before week 5 due to a flare of UC. IR dose plasma PK levels peaked at 1hour, while the MR dose was absorbed later and maintained a low exposure longer. Qualitative immunohistochemical analysis showed target engagement as indicated by increase of NLRX1 at all doses. Symptomatic efficacy was seen in 8/11 patients in the 250mg group with a PRO (RB+SF) score of 0 at week 4. The decrease in MCS was 2.1-3.4 in the NX-13 arms vs 1 point with placebo (Fig 1A) while clinical response rates ranged from 27-72% amongst the active arms with no placebo responders, though no dose-response relationship was observed (Fig 1B). Endoscopic response ranged from 27-40% (Fig 1C), with 5/32 dosed patients being in endoscopic remission. Histologic remission largely paralleled endoscopic response and cytokine and mRNA levels support target engagement. Conclusion In patients with active UC, NX-13 was well-tolerated and target engagement was achieved. The exploratory efficacy endpoints indicated rapid clinical, endoscopic, and histologic improvement at week 4, relative to placebo. This novel mechanism of action will be further evaluated in a phase 2 study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→