P349 Faecal Calprotectin in Ulcerative Colitis - Associations with Mucosal Inflammatory Activity and Disease Extent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background In ulcerative colitis (UC), faecal calprotectin (FC) correlates with endoscopic severity and disease extent, and low levels are associated with histological remission [1, 2]. The effect of mucosal inflammatory activity versus disease extent on the FC levels, remains poorly understood. We aimed to compare FC levels in patients grouped by endoscopic and histologic scores of the inflammatory activity. We also grouped patients according to active disease extent based on endoscopic or histological evaluations. Methods This was a post hoc analysis of patients diagnosed with UC or with confirmed UC at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway, from 2012 to 2020. Visits were performed at diagnosis, and after 3 and 11 months. FC was analysed in samples collected from 4 weeks before until 3 days after visits (EliA Calprotectin or EliA Calprotectin 2, Thermo Scientific). At each visit, colonoscopy was performed, and biopsies were collected from three colorectal segments (rectum, left colon, right colon). Mucosal inflammatory activity was scored endoscopically by Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES 0 – 3) and histologically by Nancy Histological Index (NHI 0 – 4). The highest value of the segmental NHI scores were reported. Disease extent was defined by Montreal classification. Distribution of acute inflammation was defined by the number of colorectal segments with NHI ≥ 2 (presence of neutrophilic infiltrates). Results In total 554 visits of 249 patients were analysed. FC levels increased significantly for every stepwise increase in MES, and median FC was 30-fold (range 19-49) higher in MES 3 than in MES 0 subgroups. The largest difference was observed between MES 1 and MES 2 (Figure 1a). FC levels also increased significantly for every stepwise increase in NHI, except between NHI 3 and NHI 4. Median FC level was 54-fold higher in NHI 4 group compared with the NHI 0 group, and the largest difference was observed between NHI 1 and NHI 2 (Figure 1b). Disease extent showed little effect on FC, and significant difference was only observed between proctitis and pancolitis with 3-fold (range 1.6 – 4.5) higher levels in the latter groups (Figure 2a). Median FC level was 3-fold higher in patients with acute inflammation in all 3 segments compared to patients with acute inflammation in only 1 colorectal segment (Figure 2b). Conclusion FC increased significantly by increasing mucosal inflammatory activity, whereas disease extent showed a modest effect on the FC levels. FC is an accurate and useful biomarker of both endoscopic and histological inflammatory activity in patients with ulcerative colitis. References: 1. Kawashima K. et al, BMC Gasteroenterology 2016 2. Magro F. et al, Gut 2019
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".