MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4318578608 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac190.1046

P916 Small bowel permeability improvement is associated with microbial changes seen in mild to moderate active paediatric Crohn’s disease patients on nutritional therapy

2023· article· en· W4318578608 on OpenAlexaff
Charlotte M. Verburgt, Katherine A. Dunn, Rotem Sigall Boneh, Eytan Wine, Marc A. Benninga, Wouter de Jonge, Johan Van Limbergen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaStollery Children's HospitalDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactuloseIntestinal permeabilityGastroenterologyMedicineCrohn's diseaseInternal medicineMannitolMicrobiomeInflammatory bowel diseaseEnteral administrationDiseaseParenteral nutritionBiologyBioinformaticsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Barrier disruption leading to impaired intestinal permeability in Crohn’s Disease (CD) has been associated with various processes, including (pro-inflammatory) cytokine production, impaired mucus production and altered tight junction protein expression. A recent study showed that healthy first-degree relatives of CD patients had abnormal intestinal permeability which was associated with altered gut microbiome composition. We have previously reported that intestinal permeability improves with nutritional therapy (by either Crohn’s disease exclusion diet (CDED) or exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN)). We hypothesized this improvement in permeability might be associated with changes in the gut microbiome caused by nutritional therapy. Methods Paediatric participants with mild-to-moderate CD from a prospective clinical trial evaluating nutritional therapy (with CDED+PEN or EEN) for induction of remission were included (NCT01728870). A lactulose/mannitol (L/M) test for intestinal permeability was performed at weeks 0 and 3 by administering a sugar solution containing lactulose (5 g) and mannitol (1 g) followed by urine collection for LC-MS/MS analysis. A cut-off L/M ratio 0.025 was used (Leibovitzh, Gastroenterology 2022). We compared 16S rRNA (V4V5) changes of dietary responders between weeks 0 and 6 to identify microbial changes associated with improved intestinal permeability. Results Paired L/M ratios were available for 53 patients (26 CDED+PEN and 27 EEN). Normal L/M ratios were seen in 15/26 (58%) of CDED+PEN patients and 15/27 (56%) of EEN patients at baseline, which improved to 19/26 (73%) in CDED+PEN and 17/27 (63%) in EEN (generalized linear model, p=0.574) at week 3. Notably, 7/11 (63%) CDED+PEN patients with abnormal intestinal permeability at baseline normalised, compared to 5/12 (41%) patients in the EEN group (NS). Dietary response has been shown to be associated with significant increases in Clostridia and decrease in Gammaproteobacteria (Gastroenterology 2019). Of dietary responders, intestinal permeability “non-improvers” showed no significant changes in microbial composition, whereas “improvers” showed significant increases in different genera of Eubacteriales (Clostridia), accompanied by increase in Alphaproteobacteria (all p<0.05,LDA >2) at week 6. Conclusion A subset of patients with paediatric CD have impaired intestinal barrier function and disrupted intestinal permeability. Achieving clinical remission and improvement in intestinal permeability share features of microbiome correction. Further study to characterise the effect of the microbiome and metabolome (including whole metagenome analysis) on intestinal permeability, particularly within a dysbiotic state such as CD, is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→